Execution Statistics

How did confession, torture, charges, and personal characteristics relate to the likelihood of execution? All figures are based on trial records and count executions per trial.

Impact of Confession & Torture on Execution Rate
GroupTrialsExecutionsRate
Confession + Torture 22 9 40.9%
Torture only 30 4 13.3%
Confession only 734 91 12.4%
Neither 2,425 126 5.2%
By Marital Status
StatusTrialsExec.Rate
Single17211.8%
Widowed1702011.8%
Married641609.4%
Execution Rate by Charge Type — Does being charged with a specific offence correlate with execution?
Maleficium
TrialsExec.Rate
Not charged3,1702136.7%
Charged411741.5%
Demonic Pact
TrialsExec.Rate
Not charged3,1812237.0%
Charged30723.3%
Witches' Meeting
TrialsExec.Rate
Not charged2,8691475.1%
Charged3428324.3%
Execution Rate by Primary Accusation Motive — Why was the person accused? Motives with fewer than 5 associated trials excluded.
MotiveTrialsExec.Rate
Neighbourhood dispute 65 26 40%
Maleficium 50 18 36%
Folk healing 48 17 35.4%
Demonic 78 16 20.5%
Fairies 10 2 20%
Treason 6 1 16.7%
Demonic possession 57 7 12.3%
Refused charity 10 1 10%
Named by another accused 42 3 7.1%
White magic 7 0 0%
Consulting a witch 12 0 0%
Property motive 6 0 0%

A case can have more than one primary motive, so totals exceed overall trial counts.

By Trial County — Counties with fewer than 5 trials excluded
CountyTrialsExec.Rate
Dumfries231460.9%
Lanark5360.0%
Aberdeen341852.9%
Shetland9444.4%
Edinburgh471940.4%
Ayr10440.0%
Renfrew321237.5%
Orkney18633.3%
Perth10330.0%
Haddington18527.8%
Ross6116.7%
Fife15213.3%
Peebles10110.0%
Not recorded2,9341364.6%
Stirling1400.0%
Linlithgow900.0%
Execution Rate by Decade — Bars show execution rate %; line shows number of trials
1560s1570s1580s1590s1600s1610s1620s1630s1640s1650s1660s1670s1680s1690s1700s1710s
1 trials8 trials5 trials56 trials14 trials24 trials29 trials30 trials41 trials94 trials44 trials83 trials11 trials25 trials33 trials1 trials
0 exec.3 exec.0 exec.28 exec.5 exec.8 exec.13 exec.12 exec.15 exec.15 exec.24 exec.23 exec.0 exec.8 exec.0 exec.0 exec.
0.0%37.5%0.0%50.0%35.7%33.3%44.8%40.0%36.6%16.0%54.5%27.7%0.0%32.0%0.0%0.0%
How the Accused Was Named — Outcome — Based on mentions in other accused persons' trials
Named asAccusedGuilty %Exec. %
Witchcraft Precedent 8 87.5% 87.5%
Known Witch 27 40.7% 44.4%
Accomplice 139 43.2% 39.6%
Consulted 3 33.3% 33.3%
Previously Tried 3 33.3% 33.3%
Denounced 96 29.2% 30.2%
Confession & Torture Rate by Charge Type — Were certain charges associated with more coercion?
Maleficium
TrialsConf. %Tort. %
Not charged 3,170 23.3% 1.5%
Charged 41 39.0% 7.3%
Demonic Pact
TrialsConf. %Tort. %
Not charged 3,181 23.5% 1.6%
Charged 30 23.3% 6.7%
Witches' Meeting
TrialsConf. %Tort. %
Not charged 2,869 20.4% 1.3%
Charged 342 50.0% 4.4%
Commissions & Higher Authority Involvement

The appeal records in this dataset primarily represent commissions and petitions from presbyteries and local authorities to higher bodies (Privy Council, Parliament, etc.) requesting permission to arrest, try, or judge a suspect — not post-verdict appeals. Of 3,211 trials, 182 (5.7%) have a commission record.

Commission Authority
Verdicts — Trials With Commission
Verdicts — Trials Without Commission